SEC’s Ex Parte Emergency Motion for an Asset Freeze in the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stefan Qin, described as a 23-year-old “citizen and resident of Australia and a part-time resident of New York, NY” who is “currently believed to be in Seoul, South Korea”; Virgil Technologies LLC, described as a Cayman Islands company based in New York, NY; Montgomery Technologies LLC, Virgil Quantitative Research, LLC, Virgil Capital LLC, each described as a Delaware company based in New York, NY, and VQR Partners LLC, described as a Cayman Islands company based in New York, NY, at the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
- Home
- Jurisdictions
- Australia
- SEC v. Stefan Qin: Asset Freeze Motion
Australia Cayman Islands Civil Courts Crypto Documents Fraud Investment Miscellaneous Regulatory South Korea United States District Court for the Southern District of New York USADecember 22, 2020
SEC v. Stefan Qin: Asset Freeze Motion
254
December 22, 2020
Stefan Qin, Virgil Technologies LLC, Montgomery Technologies LLC, Virgil Quantitative Research, LLC, Virgil Capital LLC, VQR Partners LLC
U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Topics
Australia Cayman Islands Crypto Fraud InvestmentKeywords
Coinbase Commonwealth Bank of Australia Harneys Kraken Melissa Fox Murphy